1. Cheryl Watson’s Tuning
Letter 2008 No. 3
2. Updates to TUNING Letter
& CPU Chart
3. SHARE in San Jose
4. 2009 Newsletter Rates
5. Humor from our Son-in-Law,
the Engineer
1. Cheryl Watson's
Tuning Letter 2008 No. 3
The fifty-two page 2008 No. 3 Tuning
Letter was emailed to subscribers on July 24. You may visit our Web
site at http://www.watsonwalker.com
to obtain subscription information. The following is a summary of
just some of the contents of this latest Tuning Letter:
IBM Announcements
The most important management news
in this issue is the announcement that IBM recently acquired Platform Solutions,
Inc. (PSI). PSI has developed an Intel-based machine that can run
z/OS, Linux, and Windows. This acquisition may not impact most of
our readers directly, but we’re hoping that it will help the software developers
and their sales forces by allowing z/OS to run on a less costly PC or laptop
platform.
HiperDisptach
The newest machine in the zSeries,
the z10, provides a hardware/software solution called HiperDispatch.
HiperDispatch reduces the overhead of the MP (multi-processing) effect.
The new design can provide up to a 10% improvement in performance, especially
for the very large installations. I think that it’s a great design,
and it takes minimal effort to implement.
SMF Update
This issue provides a parameter-by-parameter
review of SMF options. Because SMF (System Management Facility) is
the mechanism that provides almost all of our computer information, it’s
important to ensure that it’s healthy and running at optimum efficiency.
Reviewing the parameters periodically is one way to ensure that.
This issue continues with our SMF Update series of articles. One
important note is that in the last issue, I said that the SMF Logger wasn’t
ready for production because it didn’t have a CLEAR facility. Now
that a tool is available to solve that, I can recommend that z/OS 1.9 sites
investigate SMF Logger.
z/OS 101
The second installment of our new
series, z/OS 101, covers some basics of SMF for those people fairly
new to z/OS (page 35).
Elsewhere in This
Issue
Our User Experiences on page
39 highlights some suggestions when going to z/OS 1.9. New Function
APARs shows that IBM is now moving even more services (this time it’s
XML) to zIIP processors. Expect to see more along this line.
Some users have had problems with discretionary work on z/OS 1.8 swapping
out and taking a long time to swap back in. On page 43, we include
an APAR to correct that. In addition, we’ve included a long list
of HIPER APARs that should be of interest. Many of these APARs describe
problems where data is lost (early truncation, etc.). If you see
an ABEND or system failure, you can easily search the IBM database for
a solution. But lost data may not be discovered until it’s too late
to recover (if it’s discovered at all). That’s why I think it’s especially
important to keep HIPER DATALOSS APARs as a high priority.
2. Updates to Tuning
Letter & CPU Chart
Correction to HiperDispatch
Article
In the last issue (2008 No. 3),
while discussing HiperDispatch on page 32, I said that IRD changes the
SRM constant when configuring CPs offline and online. That is not
true, as Jim Horne of Lowe’s Companies pointed out to me.
Jim has run many tests on various configurations which prove his point
that the constants are not changed. Jim published his findings of
IRD, zIIPs, zAAPs, and RMF/CMF measurements in an excellent CMG paper called
The
Myth of MSU or, How Big is the Bucket? If you’re a CMG member,
you can obtain the paper at http://www.cmg.org/membersonly/2007/papers/7171.pdf.
Jim's SHARE presentation on the same subject is available to SHARE members
by going to session 2519 in the Orlando proceedings. The
link is http://ew.share.org/proceedingmod/abstract.cfm?abstract_id=16864.
Feedback on Last
Tuning Letter
The articles about HiperDispatch,
SMF Logger, and the SMF parameters generated a LOT of feedback – all of
it appreciated. Because of their circumstances or experience, some
people do not share my enthusiasm for the SMF Logger or HiperDispatch,
and other people have reasons why they would not use my SMF recommendations.
I welcome that feedback, and plan to include our readers’ comments in our
next issue. So, if you have something to add, please send it along.
Request for Help
Two of our readers have asked questions
that I can’t answer, but thought that other readers might be able to help.
One person would like to talk to
anyone who is using a DVIPA (Dynamic Virtual IP Addressing) Sysplex Distributor
for DB2 in their installation. Does it distribute the work correctly
for you? (And I and others would be interested in any of your conclusions
too!)
Another reader would like to know
the best way to set goals for the ADSM Server – discretionary or high,
as in SYSSTC. I found one forum that discussed this, and answers
were all over the board. Would you share any experiences that might
be helpful?
HiperDispatach=NO
on z10
A reader just converted from a z9
to a z10, left the HiperDispatch default of 'No', and continued to use
IRD with VARYCPU and CPU management enabled. They have found that
the behavior of IRD on the z10 machines is not as they expected.
It seems that the logical processors are being managed differently.
After an IPL, the number of engines online is drastically reduced and rarely
come back online.
Have you heard of any problems with
IRD after migrating to z10?
3. SHARE in San
Jose
I’ll be heading to San Jose on Saturday
for the upcoming SHARE conference (August 10-15), and I hope to see many
of you there. For information about the conference, go to www.share.org.
If you can’t attend the conference, you can still view most of the presentations
by clicking on ‘Proceedings’ on the left, then selecting ‘San Jose‘ in
the drop-down. The presentations are put up early by some speakers,
but should all be available by August 19th, which is the cut-off date.
Several speakers, like me, tend to wait until after the presentation in
case there are changes to be made.
I’ll be presenting at two sessions,
and will be part of a panel at another:
Session 3117 (with Linda Mooney)
– Can You Teach a New Capacity and Performance Specialist Old Tricks?
Hindsight and Insight, Wednesday at 1:30 pm
Session 2509 – Cheryl’s Hot Flashes
#20, Friday at 9:30 am
Session 2549 – Meet the Experts:
WLM, Performance and Capacity Planning Topics, Thursday at 4:30 pm
If you’re new to z/OS, be sure to check
out the zNextGen project and look for their favorite sessions. If
you’re an old hand at z/OS, and are coming to SHARE, be prepared for a
huge number of sessions on z/OS 1.10. Because it was only announced
on Tuesday of the February SHARE, most sessions there had only a small
amount of z/OS 1.10 information. At this SHARE, most of the sessions
will have the latest information. Obviously, I’ll be including many
of these topics in future newsletters.
4. 2009 Newsletter
Rates
Many of you have asked for the 2009
Tuning Letter and CPU Chart rates. Starting in January of 2009, the
single-site subscription will increase by $85, from $865 to $950.
This represents an increase of 5% per year since our last rate increase
two years ago. If you’ve considered subscribing to the newsletter,
be sure to do it before the end of the year.
We are also making one major change
to our rate structure: We are no longer selling individual newsletter issues
or single copies of our CPU Charts. Please check our Web site for
a complete listing of the 2009 subscription rates and for the new CPU Chart
pricing options.
5. Humor from our
Son-in-Law, the Engineer
There are 10 kinds of people in this
world. Those who understand binary, and those who don’t.
Stay Tuned!
Cheryl Watson
======================================================
Thanks for subscribing to Cheryl's
List!
Please note that this email service
is not intended to match or even summarize the large scope and volume of
information we provide in Cheryl Watson’s Tuning Letter. The
Tuning Letter is published six times a year and costs $865 (2008) for the
electronic version: a yearly CD-ROM of all back issues and six PDF issues
emailed during the year. See http://www.watsonwalker.com/TUNING.html
for details. Past tables of contents are at http://www.watsonwalker.com/TofC.html,
and some FULL SAMPLE ISSUES can be found at http://www.watsonwalker.com/sampleissues.html.
If you obtained this from someone
else and would like your own copy in the future, just go to our Web page
at http://www.watsonwalker.com
and fill out the form under "Cheryl's List." That signs you up, and
it's free! It's a one-way list, from us to you. If you make
a "reply," it will come just to us, not to the other members of the list.
We never share your address or information with anyone else. To unsubscribe
or change your email address, use the Web page and password mentioned in
your welcome message. Or, you can send an email request to admin
(at) watsonwalker.com. Past Cheryl's List issues, starting with
issue #1 from December of 1996 can be obtained at http://www.watsonwalker.com/archives.html.
In Cheryl's List, we provide updates
to our full newsletter, Cheryl Watson's Tuning Letter. We’ll also
let you know if anything of importance has been added to our Web pages,
and tell you about our other products and services, including BoxScore
and GoalTender.
So - we hope you'll find this service
valuable. Be sure to send email to technical (at) watsonwalker.com
if you have any questions or comments.