|
|
In this issue, I'll cover the following: 1. Latest CMOS Processors
1. Latest CMOS Processors On May 7th IBM announced their new G5 series of processors, the 9672-Rx6 series (announcement #198-115). This series consists of sixteen new CMOS processors, most based on a 115 MIPS uni-processor with one turbo-charged model that comes in at 900 MIPS. The effective speed and capacity of the processors confirms that CMOS can now compete with all of the current bipolars and with all but one of the current HDS Skyline models. HDS followed a week later on May 14th and announced their comparable Pilot P8 series plus two additional turbo models. Amdahl is expected to announce their next series of Millennium CMOS processors that will surpass the speed and capacity of these latest IBM and HDS models, but with an availability date of 1Q99. Other announcements, such as extensions to parallel sysplex that are provided by both vendors and IBM's latest software pricing announcements, are fully discussed in our Cheryl Watson's TUNING Letter, 1998, No. 2, which will be mailed in late May. Neither vendor announced performance estimates. The Processor group and MSUs listed below are our best estimates at this time. The new CMOS models are:
The 9672-R06 and Pilot P08 are currently announced as coupling facility
models that can be upgraded to standard S/390 processors.
2. How TUNING Letter Subscribers Can Obtain the New MIPS Ratings A major benefit of subscribing to Cheryl Watson's TUNING Letter is receiving, at no extra charge, our extensive CPU Chart and its updates. The CPU Chart contains CPU models from all three major vendors, the number of CPUs, average, min, and max MIPS, MIPS per CPU, MIPS by LSPR workloads, processor groups, MSUs, and version codes. It even provides the processor groups in descending order and MSUs for easy evaluation of options when trying to size a new machine. We've update our CPU Chart with the MIPS for these models, and the new chart will be sent out to all subscribers by the end of May. Subscribers to Cheryl Watson's TUNING Letter may ask to receive a fax or email containing MIPS for the new models by sending an email to admin@watsonwalker.com (be sure to include your company name and the address to which the TUNING Letter is mailed). 3. Correction to RESMIL Recommendation Steven Niebauer, of Wachovia Corp., brought to our attention an error in our recommendation of the RESMIL parameter of the GRSCNFxx parmlib member (see page 29 in Tuning Letter 1998, No. 1). In this article we accidentally specified that the RESMIL units were seconds rather than milliseconds. Steven also suggested we correct and clarify our definition of the RESMIL parameter. RESMIL specifies the minimum amount of time that a system must hold the RSA-message before passing it along. For your convenience, we are providing here the new complete write-up. Thanks Steven. For those of you that are not TUNING Letter subscribers, our 1998 No.1 TUNING Letter issue contained the first part of a two-part article that identifies most of the changes that might be needed in SYS1.PARMLIB and similar parameter libraries whenever you make a software or hardware configuration change. The RESMIL parameter was discussed in this article during a review of SYS1.PARMLIB member GRSCNFxx. _____ü RESMIL(n) Condition: Adding or removing systems from a sysplex. Adding or removing systems in a multi-system GRS configuration. The RESMIL parameter defines, in milliseconds, the RSA-message residency time. The default of 10 milliseconds will work for most installations, but may cause some performance problems. An RSA-message contains the information about requests for global resources, and it is this message that is passed around to each system in the ring. When an RSA-message is received on the system it is processed by GRS. The RESMIL parameter defines the minimum number of milliseconds a system must hold an RSA-message before passing it along. It does not affect the time a message is processed, but rather the minimum time a message will be resident on a system. A RESMIL(0) would indicates that the system tunes the residency time in a range with a minimum of zero. A RESMIL(10) would indicate that the system maintains a residency time of at least 10 milliseconds. Impact: MEDIUM A large RESMIL time in a small LPAR (or
on a slow machine) in the SYSPLEX could cause other systems to wait long
for a response to a request. This could cause higher response times in
the other systems. A typical situation occurs if you have just added a
small LPAR to a sysplex and that LPAR is only active 5% of the time. It
may take a long time for the LPAR to release the RSA-message. Most sites
are finding that the ability to specify RESMIL(0) or RESMIL(5) provides
significant performance benefits. IBM also recommends that you specify
the same RESMIL values on all your systems in the GRS ring regardless of
the varying size of the processors in the ring.
That's all for now. Stay tuned! Cheryl Watson
===================================================== Thanks for subscribing to Cheryl's List! Feel free to forward this to others who may be interested. If you obtained this from someone else and would like your own copy in the future, just go to our web page http://www.watsonwalker.com and fill out the form under "Cheryl's List." That signs you up, and it's free! It's a one-way list, from us to you. If you make a "reply", it will come just to me, not to the other members of the list. To subscribe or unsubscribe via email, send an email message with only the word "subscribe" or "unsubscribe" as the body of the message (drop the taglines!) to <cheryls-list-request@xmission.com>. Past issues can always be obtained at http://www.watsonwalker.com/archives.html. In this list, we'll alert you to selected APARs, flashes, or manuals, answer questions of general interest, provide updates to our printed newsletter (Cheryl Watson's TUNING Letter), let you know if anything of importance has been added to our Web pages, and, of course, tell you about our other products and services. Please note: This email service does not attempt to match the large scope and volume of information we provide in the TUNING Letter. (That publication comes out six times a year and costs $465, $515 abroad.) So for subscribers, Cheryl's List will provide quicker corrections, time-sensitive updates, breaking news, or further comments on newsletter articles already in your possession. For non-subscribers, these transmissions will give you a hint, we hope, of the quality and scope of the material normally found in the 40-60 pages of a typical TUNING Letter. If you don't receive the TUNING Letter, we'd love to have you as a customer. Please see our Web page for telephone numbers and the tables of contents of all past issues. By the way, ALL of the past print issues of the TUNING Letter are still available and may be purchased by anyone. So - we hope you'll find this service valuable. Be sure to send email
to tom@watsonwalker.com if you
have any questions or comments.
|